“A lot of swearing going on"
One morning last week, Kay
encroached upon my sense of solitude in order to ask, “Should I put honey or
jelly on my toast?”
Why
would she ask such a question? I suppose it’s because her husband is a control
freak and she must clear everything with him. -- Excuse me a second. – “No,
Darling, my wallet is on the cabinet, next to the Keurig. Please leave me
enough to tip the Sonic girl.”
Where
was I? Yes, honey or jelly? I didn’t want to complicate the stupidity—uh, the
simplicity of the question, so I said, “Use honey, Honey.”
During
my next sip of coffee, Kay said, “But, I had honey last time.” Whoa. Here we
have a case where a husband makes a decision before doing any research. I had
paid no attention to Kay’s previous selection of toast spread. So, I had nothing
on which to base my answer other than my own particular preference, which
would’ve been butter. However, butter, not being offered as a choice, I went
with honey. I got it wrong.
By the
way, Kay was merely playing along with my habit of coming up with stupid questions
for her, last one being, “Who would win in a fight between Batman and Flash?” Before
answering, Kay carefully weighed the abilities of each superhero. She said, “Is
Batman George Clooney or Ben Afleck?”
Illogic drives me right up the wall. I told Kay that the Batman character is
the same, regardless of who plays the part. And that Flash could undress
Batman, then run to a Walmart in Tornonto, come back and dress the Cape
Crusader in Batman pajamas, eliminating his access to his
little metal bat throwing things, or bullet deflecting gloves or anything that
could protect him.
Now, Kay
just gave us an example of someone using an irrelevant truth on which to base her
opinion, which begs the question, where am I going with all of this? Deep, my
friend. From the toast-thought to the depths of political-thought.
For most
of our lives, we’ve been witness to decisions made and opinions formed by
people (like us) who don’t know all of the truths surrounding a given
situation. A close friend of mine agreed to spend Super Bowl weekend with us
just so I’d have someone to watch the game with. He had sworn off pro-football
because of some players kneeling during the National Anthem. They’re making
millions of dollars, yet have the gall to show their disrespect for the
greatest country in the world.
Even
though football season is over, the anger persists, and the hue and cry is for
something to be done so the behavior doesn’t show itself again.
I must
say that any demonstration in our country over issues, real or imagined, should
give us increased pride in this country of ours. After all, a million or so Americans
have fought and died to secure our right of peaceful protest. Today there are several
million American citizens and non-citizens, whom, after having sworn to protect
and defend the Constitution of the United State, are out there right now doing
just that.
That’s
the only thing federal workers must swear or affirm -- to protect and defend
the Constitution of the United States. Not, the nation, its people, our
churches, our immigrants or our institutions. Just the Constitution, because in
defending and protecting the oldest working Constitution on earth, they are
protecting every person in this nation right now the right of life, liberty and
property.
The
Presidential oath is a little different
in that he also swears to “preserve” the Constitution. Congress doesn't have to “preserve” anything, however they must swear to protect, defend and “support”
the Constitution. A lot of swearing going on in the halls of government.
In doing
so, our government officials are assuring the rights of all of us to peacefully
demonstrate against any governmental action or inaction. I’m not saying there
will be no repercussion for demonstrating. Your employer might fire you for
demonstrating, but he will need to show a federal judge that he has a
Constitutional right to do so, and the Supreme Court can change the judge’s
ruling if it feels it was wrongly rendered. More than likely you’ll lose a few friends who
don’t agree with your stance on an issue.
Regardless,
continue to boycott football. And, if you have a suspicion that Starbucks is
trying to steal Christmas from you by not using cups with the proper colors, boycott
‘em! Persecute the daylights out of ‘em,
but please, do it in a godly manner.
Bottom
line, after researching the truth surrounding something that we view as unacceptable,
we have the right to be angry, to share our anger and to raise a big stink against
whatever we see as wrong. But, perhaps we should also take a moment to
recognize the wisdom of our founding fathers in preventing our government from
taking action against those who legally demonstrate their displeasure in the
way things are run.
We each have
the right to voice our grievances. We can demonstrate against some of the
actions or inaction of our government officials, and we have the right to
demonstrate against those who are demonstrating. Is this country great or what!
– And, to think, this all started with a question about toast.
end
Mark can be contacted at hayter.mark@gmail.com.